2024 年2 月22 日，多個ISO 管理系統標準(MSS) 以附加文本的形式進行了修訂，強調了氣候
變遷作為相關管理系統組織背景下考慮因素的重要性。
這些變更（兩個新聲明）已納入ISO 9001 的第4.1 和4.2 條以及其他MSS 中的等同條款，如下
所示：
4.1 Understanding the organization and its context.
The organization shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the intended result(s) of its XXX management system.
Added: The organization shall determine whether climate change is a relevant issue.
4.1 了解組織及其背景。
組織機構必須確定相關於其組織目的與策略方向並會影響其達成XX 管理系統的意圖結果的各種外部與內部議題。
補充：組織須確定氣候變遷是否為相關問題。
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties.
The organization shall determine:
• the interested parties that are relevant to the XXX management system.
• the relevant requirements of these interested parties.
• which of these requirements will be addressed through the XXX management system.
Added: NOTE Relevant interested parties can have requirements related to climate change.
4.2 了解眾利害相關體的需求與期望。
組織機構必須確定：
• 與XXX 管理系統相關的眾利害相關體。
• 這些眾利害相關體的要求。
• 其中哪些要求將透過XXX 管理系統滿足。
補充： 註：眾利害相關體可以提出與氣候變遷相關的要求。
Amended MSS of most relevance to us are: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 19443, ISO 20000-1, ISO 22000, ISO
22301, ISO 27001, ISO 45001, ISO 50001.
與我們最相關的修訂版MSS 包括：ISO 9001、ISO 14001、ISO 19443、ISO 20000-1、ISO 22000、ISO
22301、ISO 27001、ISO 45001、ISO 50001。
As per IAF/ISO Joint Communiqué (link at the end of thisMemo), “The overall intent of the requirements for clauses 4.1 and 4.2 remain unchanged; these clauses already include the need for the organization to
consider all internal and external issues that can impact the effectiveness of their management system; these new inclusions are assuring that Climate Change is considered within the management system and that it is an external factor that is important enough for our community to require organizations to consider it now.”
根據IAF/ISO 聯合公報（連結位於本備忘錄末尾），「第4.1 和4.2 條要求的整體意圖保持不變；
這些條款已經包括組織機構需要考慮所有可能影響其管理系統有效性的內部和外部議題；這些新的內容確保了氣候變遷在管理系統中得到考慮，並且它是一個外部議題，對於我們的社區來說足夠重要，要求組織機構現在就考慮它。”
Amendments in ISO standards are not new requirements, which means that a certification transition is not needed, and revisions to certificates are not necessary.
ISO 標準的修訂並不是新的要求，這意味著不需要驗證過渡，也不需要對證書進行修訂。
When our auditors audit the clauses 4.1 and 4.2, will need to continue to audit them to ensure that all
internal and external issues,which includes Climate Change, have been determined by our clients as relevantor not and if so, considered within their system’s objectives and risk evaluation, within the scope of theirmanagement system.
當稽核員在稽核第4.1 和4.2 條，他們將需要繼續對其進行稽核，以確保我們的客戶已確定所有
內部和外部議題（包括氣候變遷）是否相關，如果相關，則予以考慮在其系統的目標和風險評估的
範圍內，在其管理系統的範圍內。
As with normal practice, where a certified organisation cannot demonstrate that all external and internal
issues, including Climate Change, have been determined as relevant or not, a suitable finding should be
raised.
與正常做法一樣，如果驗證組織無法證明所有外部和內部議題（包括氣候變遷）已被確定為相關或
不相關，則應提出適當的調查結果。
常見FAQ
(1)
- Question : Is there any grace period for our clients to conform with the amendments?
- Answer: No. Climate Change should already be included in the organisation's determination of relevant issues. Local offices might, though, want to remind their clients of these amendments ahead of the next audit.
- 問：我們的客戶是否有寬限期來遵守修訂？
- 答：不需要。氣候變遷應該已經被納入該組織對相關問題的確定。不過，當地辦事處可能希望在下次稽核之前提醒客戶注意這些修訂。
(2)
- Question: From when should we be auditing the compliance with the amendments?
- Answer: Since the publication of the amendments, 22nd February 2024.
- 問：我們應該從什麼時候開始稽核修正案的遵守情況？
- 答：自修訂案發布之日起，即2024 年2 月22 日。
(3)
- Question: Will the affected MSS be revised, considering the amendments?
- Answer: Eventually yes, as part of the normal review process of the standard. But for now, both documents,standard and amendment, coexist.
- 問：考慮到修訂內容，受影響的MSS 是否會進行修訂？
答：最終是的，作為標準正常審查過程的一部分。但目前，標準和修正案這兩份文件
並存。
如有其他任何問題，歡迎隨時與貴司專屬客服窗口聯繫。